24/7 Live Call Answering
(470) 558-049524/7 Live Call Answering
(470) 558-0495Your spouse’s serious injuries from an accident haven’t just affected their life. Your marriage has changed fundamentally as you’ve become a caregiver instead of a partner, physical intimacy has disappeared, and the person you married struggles with pain and limitations that affect every aspect of your relationship. These losses have real value under the law, and you might have your own claim for compensation separate from your spouse’s injury claim.
Our friends at Choulos & Tsoi Law Firm discuss how loss of consortium claims recognize that serious injuries affect entire families, not just injured victims. A wrongful death lawyer can evaluate whether family members have viable consortium claims and pursue compensation for the ways injuries have damaged important relationships.
Loss of consortium is a legal claim that allows spouses (and in some states, other family members) to seek compensation for the loss of relationship benefits when someone they love is seriously injured. The claim acknowledges that injuries affect marriages, parent-child relationships, and family dynamics in ways that deserve recognition and compensation.
The term “consortium” encompasses multiple aspects of relationships including companionship, affection, sexual relations, assistance with household tasks, moral support, and the general benefits of having a healthy, functional partner or family member.
These claims are derivative, meaning they depend on the injured person having a valid underlying injury claim. If the injured person has no case against the at-fault party, family members typically can’t pursue consortium claims either.
Spouses have the strongest and most universally recognized consortium claims. Every state allows husbands and wives to seek compensation when their partner’s injuries fundamentally change their marriage.
Some states extend consortium claims to children who’ve lost the care, guidance, and companionship of an injured parent. These parental consortium claims recognize that children suffer real losses when parents can no longer participate fully in their lives due to injuries.
A few jurisdictions allow parents to bring consortium claims when adult children are seriously injured, though these claims are less common and face more restrictions than spousal or child claims.
Unmarried partners, even those in long-term committed relationships, generally cannot bring consortium claims in most states. The law traditionally recognizes only formal marriages, though a handful of states allow domestic partners or others to pursue these claims.
Loss of companionship compensates for the diminished relationship quality when injuries prevent shared activities, meaningful conversation, or emotional connection. If you can no longer enjoy hobbies together, travel, or simply spend quality time because of injuries, this loss has value.
Loss of affection addresses both physical and emotional intimacy. Serious injuries often eliminate or severely reduce sexual relations, but consortium claims also cover the loss of everyday affection like holding hands, hugging, or physical closeness that injuries make difficult or impossible.
Loss of services includes help with household tasks, childcare, home maintenance, and other practical assistance that spouses provide each other. When you must hire help or do everything yourself because your spouse is too injured to contribute, those lost services have economic and emotional value.
Loss of society recognizes the intangible but real value of having a spouse who can participate in family and social life. When injuries force your partner to withdraw from activities, miss family events, or become unable to socialize, you’ve lost important aspects of your marriage.
Not every injury supports a consortium claim. Minor injuries that heal quickly without significantly impacting relationships don’t create compensable consortium losses. The injury must be serious enough to fundamentally alter the relationship dynamics.
Factors supporting strong consortium claims include:
The more severe and lasting the impact on your relationship, the more valuable your consortium claim becomes.
No mathematical formula calculates consortium damages. Juries consider the nature of the relationship before the injury, the extent of changes caused by injuries, the age and life expectancy of both parties, and other factors affecting the loss’s magnitude and duration.
Young couples face decades living with relationship changes, potentially justifying higher consortium awards than older couples who might have shorter remaining lives together. However, losing companionship in retirement years when couples expected to enjoy freedom together also creates significant damages.
The strength and quality of the relationship before injury matters. Strong marriages with close emotional bonds support higher consortium values than troubled relationships where little was lost.
Personal testimony from the spouse or family member about how the relationship has changed provides the foundation for consortium claims. Explaining specific activities you can no longer share, ways intimacy has disappeared, and how daily life has changed makes abstract concepts concrete.
Friends and family who’ve witnessed relationship changes can testify about differences they’ve observed. Their outside perspective validates your testimony and shows the changes are real and noticeable to others.
Photos and videos showing pre-injury activities and relationship quality contrast with post-injury limitations. Evidence of the active, engaged life you shared before contrasted with current limitations demonstrates tangible losses.
Consortium claims require discussing private matters including sexual relations. Many people feel uncomfortable testifying publicly about intimate aspects of their marriage, but this testimony is necessary to prove the full extent of consortium losses.
Judges and juries understand that discussing these matters is difficult. They expect testimony about intimate relationships in consortium cases and don’t view it as inappropriate or embarrassing within this legal context.
Your attorney can prepare you for the type of questions you’ll face and help you discuss sensitive topics in ways that are honest but not needlessly graphic or uncomfortable.
Insurance companies often minimize or ignore consortium claims during settlement negotiations. They might offer token amounts that don’t reflect the true impact on your relationship or refuse to value these claims at all.
Including consortium claims in demand letters and explicitly seeking compensation for family members signals you understand the full scope of damages and won’t accept settlements that only address the injured person’s losses.
Consortium claims are technically separate legal claims from the injured person’s case, but they’re almost always pursued together. The same defendant is liable for both the injury and its effects on your relationship.
Some jurisdictions require consortium claims to be filed as part of the same lawsuit as the injured person’s case. Others allow separate filing but consolidate cases for trial to avoid duplicative litigation.
This joint resolution means consortium claims add to the overall settlement value rather than being pursued independently. The family receives one settlement that compensates both the injured person and the family member’s consortium losses.
Consortium claim compensation typically receives the same favorable tax treatment as personal injury damages. These amounts generally aren’t taxable because they compensate for loss rather than creating income or gain.
However, consortium claims don’t involve physical injury to the person receiving them, creating some ambiguity about tax treatment. Consult tax professionals about specific tax implications of consortium compensation.
Consortium claim availability and scope vary significantly among states. Some states are generous in recognizing these claims for various family members, while others restrict them to spouses only.
Damage caps in some states apply to all damages including consortium claims. This can limit recovery even when relationship impacts are severe and long-lasting.
Understanding your specific state’s laws about who can bring consortium claims, what damages are recoverable, and what limitations apply affects both claim strategy and expected recovery.
Ironically, some injuries so fundamentally change the injured person that marriages don’t survive. When divorce results from injury-related changes, consortium claims become more complicated.
The loss of relationship is real and occurred before divorce, but proving damages becomes difficult when the relationship has legally ended. Some states bar consortium claims after divorce, while others allow recovery for losses that occurred before the marriage ended.
Children who lose the active participation of an injured parent suffer real losses that some states recognize through parental consortium claims. A child whose parent becomes unable to play, attend events, or provide guidance and support has lost valuable elements of the parent-child relationship.
These claims are even more difficult to value than spousal consortium because parent-child relationships differ so greatly at different ages. A toddler losing an active parent faces different impacts than a teenager losing parental guidance.
Consortium claims require documenting intangible relationship changes in concrete ways. Specific examples, consistent testimony, and evidence of the relationship before injury all support these claims that can significantly increase family recovery from serious accidents.
If your spouse or family member has been seriously injured and their injuries have fundamentally changed your relationship in ways that affect daily life, intimacy, companionship, or the partnership you shared, reach out to discuss whether you have a viable loss of consortium claim and how to document and pursue compensation for these often-overlooked damages.